You can use HALion Sonic 3 or even HALion Sonic SE 3. There are a lot of Tabs and panels in HALion 6.īut you don't need to use HALion 6 if you only want to play back instruments. HALion's can be a bit intimidating at first glance. I think most people prefer Falcon's UI to HALion's. I do like some of UVI's Plug-ins, though. It's more comparable to the stuff from IK Multimedia for SampleTank/Syntronik, etc. UVI has a lot, but a lot of their stuff isn't what I would consider AAA quality. Steinberg has been upping the ante when it comes to releasing more library content for HALion, though. You could theoretically do this in HALion (or Kontakt, for the matter), but neither NI nor Steinberg are really going there. It does all of the stuff Kontakt does, as well as everything Pigments does (Analog, Granular, Wavetable synthesis, etc.).Ī lot of Falcon's MIDI FX are scripts. HALion and Falcon are like if you had merged Kontakt with a product like Arturia Pigments. However, HALion and Falcon go much further than Kontakt does. Kontakt also has some synthesis ability, as well. u/spu7nic81 - HALion is comparable to Kontakt in that it is also a fully-fledged Sampler. The better Granular in HALion is likely to give them more value. I actually don't think the FM Engine in Falcon is a competitive advantage in the grand scheme of things, as FM has a very high skill floor and most people are going not going to feel the need to go there. When learning how to actually script and create instruments, this is a huge deal.īesides those differences, the two products are far more similar than different. HALion also has far better developer documentation, publicly available, because - like Kontakt - it allows any owner of the product to create content and distribute it to other HALion users for consumption. AFAIK, Falcon is still pegged to one CPU Core. HALion has better Multi-Core utilization.After installation they will show up in the MediaBay Browser - complete with Iconography, tagging, and library-specific GUI in the product.You can create your own VST Sound Libraries and distribute them to HALion Sonic and HALion Sonic SE users. Falcon doesn't allow you to create Instrument Libraries that you can distribute to Falcon, UVI Workstation or MachFive users to load into the browser of those products - unless you get a Developer License from UVI (which apparently isn't all that cheap, but that's hearsay).Most other "Samplers" are only about cutting up and working with pre-recorded audio. They are some of the last holdovers when it comes to "Samplers" that actually allow you to Live Sample (think MPC or Maschine Live Sampling Workflow). This goes for both HALion 6 and Groove Agent 5.HALion allows you to Sample Live Audio Input.I also think it has better Wavetable Synthesis. HALion's Granular Synthesis is better.They do give you a sizeable voucher that can be used to buy a couple/few expansions, though. Falcon ships, by default, with a Factory Library comparable to most other Synths on the market.You'd have to pay UVI for additional libraries to get anything comparable.Falcon doesn't ship with any Acoustic Instrument Libraries, while HALion ships with a very nice Factory Library of Acoustic and Synthesized Instruments/Libraries.Falcon and HALion are largely comparable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |